View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0002809 | GNUnet | testbed service | public | 2013-03-03 01:31 | 2013-12-24 20:55 |
Reporter | LRN | Assigned To | Sree Harsha Totakura | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | crash | Reproducibility | random |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
Product Version | Git master | ||||
Target Version | 0.10.0 | Fixed in Version | 0.10.0 | ||
Summary | 0002809: Crash in testbed service during topology test | ||||
Description | subj Also happened on the W32 buildslave several times. The problem is quite old (older than 2 weeks, that's for sure). | ||||
Additional Information | It prints: Failed to connect two peers: 0x15: Failed to connect to CORE of peer withid: 2 then crashes Reading symbols from d:\progs\gnunet\lib\gnunet\libexec\gnunet-service-testbed.exe...done. Continuing. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 7528.0x2e98] 0x00410662 in cleanup_occ (occ=0x2645510) at gnunet-service-testbed_oc.c:437 437 (GNUNET_YES == GST_peer_list[occ->other_peer_id]->destroy_flag) && (gdb) bt #0 0x00410662 in cleanup_occ (occ=0x2645510) at gnunet-service-testbed_oc.c:437 #1 0x00415b2f in GST_free_occq () at gnunet-service-testbed_oc.c:1583 #2 0x0040aa7b in shutdown_task (cls=0x0, tc=0x28fc70) at gnunet-service-testbed.c:2093 #3 0x62b7fca5 in run_ready (rs=0xe5eee0, ws=0x25c9cd8) at scheduler.c:597 #4 0x62b804cb in GNUNET_SCHEDULER_run (task=0x62b8c823 <service_task>, task_cls=0x28fe18) at scheduler.c:786 #5 0x62b8d663 in GNUNET_SERVICE_run (argc=3, argv=0x25bbce8, service_name=0x4182e5 <__register_frame_info+4293349> "testbed", options=GNUNET_SERVICE_OPTION_NONE, task=0x40b5d2 <testbed_run>, task_cls=0x0) at service.c:1815 #6 0x0040bb94 in main (argc=3, argv=0x25bbce8) at gnunet-service-testbed.c:2295 (gdb) p GST_peer-list No symbol "GST_peer" in current context. (gdb) p GST_peer_list $0 = (struct Peer **) 0x0 | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
|
i committed a fix in SVN 26291 for this. Could you please check if the bug is fixed by it? |
|
marking as resolved as the crash is not being observed anymore. |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2013-03-03 01:31 | LRN | New Issue | |
2013-03-03 01:31 | LRN | Status | new => assigned |
2013-03-03 01:31 | LRN | Assigned To | => Sree Harsha Totakura |
2013-03-04 11:29 | Sree Harsha Totakura | Note Added: 0006921 | |
2013-03-04 11:29 | Sree Harsha Totakura | Status | assigned => feedback |
2013-03-13 16:58 | Sree Harsha Totakura | Note Added: 0006956 | |
2013-03-13 16:58 | Sree Harsha Totakura | Status | feedback => resolved |
2013-03-13 16:58 | Sree Harsha Totakura | Fixed in Version | => 0.10.0 |
2013-03-13 16:58 | Sree Harsha Totakura | Resolution | open => fixed |
2013-03-18 14:57 | Christian Grothoff | Target Version | => 0.10.0 |
2013-12-24 20:55 | Christian Grothoff | Status | resolved => closed |