View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0006370 | libeufin | other | public | 2020-06-09 11:24 | 2023-01-08 10:33 |
| Reporter | Florian Dold | Assigned To | Florian Dold | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Target Version | 0.9.0 | Fixed in Version | 0.9.0 | ||
| Summary | 0006370: date range and defaulting to "no date range" is not very intuitive | ||||
| Description | Right now it is not clear whether the "maximum" date range will be used when omitting a date range in a request, or the latest transactions will be queried because *no* date range is given. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
|
|
We now moved to a clearer format for both EBICS order param specifications as well as the bank account's fetch specification. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-09 11:24 | Florian Dold | New Issue | |
| 2020-06-18 21:55 | Florian Dold | Assigned To | => Florian Dold |
| 2020-06-18 21:55 | Florian Dold | Status | new => resolved |
| 2020-06-18 21:55 | Florian Dold | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2020-06-18 21:55 | Florian Dold | Note Added: 0016307 | |
| 2023-01-08 10:32 | Christian Grothoff | Fixed in Version | => 0.9.0 |
| 2023-01-08 10:32 | Christian Grothoff | Target Version | => 0.9.0 |
| 2023-01-08 10:33 | Christian Grothoff | Status | resolved => closed |
