View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0002044 | gnunet-gtk | gnunet-setup | public | 2011-12-27 12:19 | 2012-02-28 11:06 |
| Reporter | milan | Assigned To | Christian Grothoff | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Product Version | 0.9.1 | ||||
| Target Version | 0.9.2 | Fixed in Version | 0.9.2 | ||
| Summary | 0002044: Wrong use of "hole-punched" in gnunet-setup | ||||
| Description | In contrib/gnunet_setup_gtk_main_window.glade, there's an option called: "NAT has been hole-punched manually" described below as: "Set this option if you have configured your NAT to forward the ports for the various enabled GNUnet transports.[...]" To me, this isn't hole-punching at all: this is simply opening ports manually, which is very different. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hole_punching So, could this label be changed to this? "NAT ports have been set open manually" The same problem happens in setup/gnunet-setup-options.c: "Check if the NAT has been hole-punched manually" | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12-27 12:19 | milan | New Issue | |
| 2011-12-27 16:59 | Christian Grothoff | Assigned To | => Christian Grothoff |
| 2011-12-27 16:59 | Christian Grothoff | Status | new => confirmed |
| 2011-12-27 23:43 | Christian Grothoff | Note Added: 0005213 | |
| 2011-12-27 23:43 | Christian Grothoff | Status | confirmed => resolved |
| 2011-12-27 23:43 | Christian Grothoff | Fixed in Version | => 0.9.2 |
| 2011-12-27 23:43 | Christian Grothoff | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2011-12-27 23:50 | Christian Grothoff | Target Version | => 0.9.2 |
| 2012-02-28 11:06 | Christian Grothoff | Status | resolved => closed |
