View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0010564 | Taler | documentation | public | 2025-11-08 18:18 | 2025-11-09 21:47 |
| Reporter | htgoebel | Assigned To | Christian Grothoff | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | text | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Product Version | 1.0 | ||||
| Target Version | 1.2 | Fixed in Version | 1.2 | ||
| Summary | 0010564: Contradictory statements about refund deadline/delay | ||||
| Description | Documentation says: interface PostOrderRequest { // … If it's not set, refunds will not be possible. refund_delay?: RelativeTime; … interface OrderCommon { // After this deadline has passed, no refunds will be accepted. // Overrides deadline calculated from refund_delay in // PostOrderRequest. refund_deadline?: Timestamp; This is contradictory: Is PostOrderRequest.refund_delay to enable refunding, or is it enough to set OrderCommon.refund_deadline? | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
|
|
Yeah, this has also evolved a bit. instance default << refund_delay << refund_deadline is the precedence. Clarified in 4573bd12..69bcca03 |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-08 18:18 | htgoebel | New Issue | |
| 2025-11-09 21:47 | Christian Grothoff | Note Added: 0026348 | |
| 2025-11-09 21:47 | Christian Grothoff | Assigned To | => Christian Grothoff |
| 2025-11-09 21:47 | Christian Grothoff | Status | new => resolved |
| 2025-11-09 21:47 | Christian Grothoff | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2025-11-09 21:47 | Christian Grothoff | Fixed in Version | => 1.2 |
| 2025-11-09 21:47 | Christian Grothoff | Product Version | => 1.0 |
| 2025-11-09 21:47 | Christian Grothoff | Target Version | => 1.2 |
| 2025-11-09 21:47 | Christian Grothoff | Severity | minor => text |
