View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0006631 | Taler | obsolete component | public | 2020-10-29 00:44 | 2022-11-04 20:53 |
| Reporter | Christian Grothoff | Assigned To | MS | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | major | Reproducibility | N/A |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Platform | i7 | OS | Debian GNU/Linux | OS Version | squeeze |
| Product Version | git (master) | ||||
| Target Version | 0.9 | Fixed in Version | 0.9 | ||
| Summary | 0006631: various http status codes returned by the python bank are highly questionable | ||||
| Description | 653f6ae..3298ef8 marks those with 'WTF'. (Also introduces symbolic names.) Please check the status codes, and: - unless there is a good reason, change as indicated, alas also - ensure they are consistent with what LibEuFin does, if applicable - ensure that they are consistent with the bank API documentation - ensure that they are acceptable to the test cases - ensure that they match the documented HTTP status code in GANA | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
|
|
Status codes changed here: 354bf3cf733d8d97a82e951d1b9a2f5a161d03cd. Tests are also passing. Other checks reported in the bug description are still work in progress. |
|
|
The three discussed status codes are returned, respectively, after the (three) exceptions below: PrivateAccountException: someone tried to ask the public history of a non public account. This happens only in a HTML response, and for this reason there is no documentation to check. SameAccountException: this is raised in two, very, rare cases: (1) the customer who is withdrawing coins and the exchange have the same (!!) account. (2) The exchange and the merchant being paid have the same (!!) account. This case too seems avoidable to document. DebitLimitException: yes, this needs to be documented. According to some research, the only place where this can (programmatically) happen is where a exchange pays a merchant (but has no sufficient balance for it.) |
|
|
MS: are you asking a question about those three cases? I'm a bit confused what (if anything) is needed by you to resolve this. |
|
|
I wrote it more to point out that only one case (the last) is eligible to be documented. Because the bug report asks to 'check if they are consistent with the bank API documentation'. |
|
|
Has this been fixed? If not, please do so soon! |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-29 00:44 | Christian Grothoff | New Issue | |
| 2020-10-29 00:44 | Christian Grothoff | Status | new => assigned |
| 2020-10-29 00:44 | Christian Grothoff | Assigned To | => MS |
| 2020-10-29 00:44 | Christian Grothoff | Description Updated | |
| 2020-10-30 11:12 | MS | Note Added: 0017067 | |
| 2020-10-30 18:16 | MS | Note Added: 0017070 | |
| 2020-10-31 10:32 | Christian Grothoff | Target Version | 0.8 => 0.8.1 |
| 2020-11-03 22:53 | Christian Grothoff | Note Added: 0017100 | |
| 2020-11-03 23:00 | MS | Note Added: 0017101 | |
| 2021-01-01 16:42 | Christian Grothoff | Note Added: 0017292 | |
| 2021-08-24 20:53 | Christian Grothoff | Target Version | => 0.9 |
| 2022-07-18 17:43 | Christian Grothoff | Status | assigned => resolved |
| 2022-07-18 17:43 | Christian Grothoff | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2022-07-18 17:43 | Christian Grothoff | Fixed in Version | => 0.9 |
| 2022-08-23 20:26 | Christian Grothoff | Category | bank (demonstrator) => py bank (demonstrator, obsolete) |
| 2022-11-04 20:53 | Christian Grothoff | Status | resolved => closed |
| 2023-12-03 01:23 | Christian Grothoff | Category | py bank (demonstrator, obsolete) => obsolete componet |
| 2023-12-11 20:08 | Florian Dold | Category | obsolete componet => obsolete component |
