View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0011446 | Taler | deployment and operations | public | 2026-05-27 19:34 | 2026-05-30 07:55 |
| Reporter | vecirex | Assigned To | vecirex | ||
| Priority | urgent | Severity | block | Reproducibility | have not tried |
| Status | feedback | Resolution | open | ||
| Summary | 0011446: Test KYC Auth reset via SQL | ||||
| Description | Directly related to 0011428, trying on TOPS/Stage if this works, i.e., doesn't create additional issues or even ends up w/ dysfunctional instances. Three types of merchants shall be considered: * kycauth_1_pending: merchant which entered an IBAN, but did not yet pay * kycauth_2_kyc_ok: as above, but transfer fulfilled; exchange acceptance gotten * kycauth_3_kyc_ok_and_withdraw: dito as w/ kycauth_2*, but additionally the merchant also acts as wallet user and withdrew money from the exchange he verified against as merchant, and doing so to the *very same IBAN* which was used as merchant (for IBAN settlements from paid orders) | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
|
|
Following situation was created on TOPS/CHF stage (cf. https://docs.taler.net/deployments/tops-stage-devtesting.html):
sudo -u taler-merchant-httpd psql taler-merchant -c "
SET search_path TO merchant;
SELECT
mi.merchant_id,
mi.merchant_name AS business_name,
k.kyc_ok,
to_timestamp(k.kyc_timestamp / 1000000) AT TIME ZONE 'Europe/Zurich' AS timestamp_cest,
k.access_token
FROM merchant_kyc k
JOIN merchant_accounts ma ON k.account_serial = ma.account_serial
JOIN merchant_instances mi USING (merchant_serial)
WHERE mi.merchant_id ILIKE 'kyc%'
ORDER BY mi.merchant_id;
" 2>&1 | cat
SET
merchant_id | business_name | kyc_ok | timestamp_cest | access_token
--------------------------------+--------------------+--------+---------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------
kycauth_1_pending | KYC Auth 1 Pending | f | 2026-05-29 18:43:58 |
kycauth_1_pending | KYC Auth 1 Pending | f | 2026-05-29 18:43:58 |
kycauth_2_kyc_ok | KYC Auth 2 KYC OK | t | 2026-05-29 18:47:22 | \xb0e861480d1aac501c2dccee4a8e4a24961434230017bc133f2ee30100b1fa87
kycauth_2_kyc_ok | KYC Auth 2 KYC OK | f | 2026-05-29 18:43:58 |
kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw | Tammy Tester | t | 2026-05-29 18:55:00 | \x036cbe036d4937c0f963ce76b98b72d93bf00cd47f9fff7a41b8e695ffd6463f
kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw | Tammy Tester | f | 2026-05-29 18:52:28 |
(6 rows)
|
|
|
0. Backup DB, even if it's "only" stagesudo -u postgres pg_dumpall > /root/backups/postgres-backup-$EPOCHSECONDS.sql sudo -u taler-merchant-httpd pg_dump taler-merchant > /root/backups/taler-merchant-backup-$EPOCHSECONDS.sql 1. Test for kycauth_1_pending 1a. DB situation w/ relevant KYC fields found:
sudo -u taler-merchant-httpd psql taler-merchant -c "
SET search_path TO merchant;
SELECT
mi.merchant_id,
mi.merchant_name AS business_name,
k.kyc_ok,
k.kyc_timestamp,
to_timestamp(k.kyc_timestamp / 1000000) AT TIME ZONE 'Europe/Zurich' AS timestamp_cest,
k.access_token,
k.exchange_url,
k.exchange_http_status,
k.exchange_ec_code,
k.next_kyc_poll,
k.kyc_backoff
FROM merchant_kyc k
JOIN merchant_accounts ma ON k.account_serial = ma.account_serial
JOIN merchant_instances mi USING (merchant_serial)
WHERE mi.merchant_id = 'kycauth_1_pending';
" 2>&1 | cat
SET
merchant_id | business_name | kyc_ok | kyc_timestamp | timestamp_cest | access_token | exchange_url | exchange_http_status | exchange_ec_code | next_kyc_poll | kyc_backoff
-------------------+--------------------+--------+------------------+---------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------+----------------------+------------------+------------------+-------------
kycauth_1_pending | KYC Auth 1 Pending | f | 1780073038000000 | 2026-05-29 18:43:58 | | https://exchange.stage.taler-ops.ch/ | 0 | 10 | 1780074838551502 | 1800000000
kycauth_1_pending | KYC Auth 1 Pending | f | 1780073038000000 | 2026-05-29 18:43:58 | | https://exchange.taler-ops.ch/ | 0 | 10 | 1780074838550415 | 1800000000
(2 rows)
1b. Tentative KYC Reset
sudo -u taler-merchant-httpd psql taler-merchant -c "
SET search_path TO merchant;
BEGIN;
UPDATE merchant_kyc
SET
access_token = NULL,
kyc_ok = FALSE,
kyc_timestamp = 0,
exchange_http_status = 0,
exchange_ec_code = 0,
next_kyc_poll = 0,
kyc_backoff = 0
WHERE account_serial IN (
SELECT ma.account_serial
FROM merchant_accounts ma
JOIN merchant_instances mi USING (merchant_serial)
WHERE mi.merchant_id = 'kycauth_1_pending'
);
COMMIT;
SELECT 'KYC reset completed for instance:' AS status, 'kycauth_1_pending' AS instance" 2>&1 | cat
SET
BEGIN
UPDATE 2
COMMIT
status | instance
-----------------------------------+-------------------
KYC reset completed for instance: | kycauth_1_pending
(1 row)
1c. Restart of taler-merchant-httpd, and check if it's running: systemctl restart taler-merchant-httpd systemctl --failed UNIT LOAD ACTIVE SUB DESCRIPTION 0 loaded units listed. 1d. Check DB entries Looks fine, most notably time is changed, that is, including next KYC poll attempt, shown in Zurich / CEST time:
sudo -u taler-merchant-httpd psql taler-merchant -c "
SET search_path TO merchant;
SELECT
mi.merchant_id,
mi.merchant_name AS business_name,
k.kyc_ok,
k.kyc_timestamp,
to_timestamp(k.kyc_timestamp / 1000000) AT TIME ZONE 'Europe/Zurich' AS timestamp_cest,
k.access_token,
k.exchange_url,
k.exchange_http_status,
k.exchange_ec_code,
to_timestamp(k.next_kyc_poll / 1000000) AT TIME ZONE 'Europe/Zurich' AS timestamp_kyc_poll_cest,
k.kyc_backoff
FROM merchant_kyc k
JOIN merchant_accounts ma ON k.account_serial = ma.account_serial
JOIN merchant_instances mi USING (merchant_serial)
WHERE mi.merchant_id = 'kycauth_1_pending';
" 2>&1 | cat
SET
merchant_id | business_name | kyc_ok | kyc_timestamp | timestamp_cest | access_token | exchange_url | exchange_http_status | exchange_ec_code | timestamp_kyc_poll_cest | kyc_backoff
-------------------+--------------------+--------+------------------+---------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------+----------------------+------------------+-------------------------+-------------
kycauth_1_pending | KYC Auth 1 Pending | f | 1780076639000000 | 2026-05-29 19:43:59 | | https://exchange.stage.taler-ops.ch/ | 0 | 10 | 2026-05-29 19:46:23 | 1800000000
kycauth_1_pending | KYC Auth 1 Pending | f | 1780076639000000 | 2026-05-29 19:43:59 | | https://exchange.taler-ops.ch/ | 0 | 10 | 2026-05-29 19:46:23 | 1800000000
(2 rows)
1e. Check merchant portal Nothing specially noted, KYC still shown as pending, also KYC:* string w/ public key for wire transfer remains stable. |
|
|
2. Test for kycauth_2_kyc_ok 2a. DB situation w/ relevant KYC fields found Note that for the exchange case where KYC is done, there's no real next KYC poll time in the near future; both timestamps are equal:
sudo -u taler-merchant-httpd psql taler-merchant -c "
SET search_path TO merchant;
SELECT
mi.merchant_id,
mi.merchant_name AS business_name,
k.kyc_ok,
k.kyc_timestamp,
to_timestamp(k.kyc_timestamp / 1000000) AT TIME ZONE 'Europe/Zurich' AS timestamp_cest,
k.access_token,
k.exchange_url,
k.exchange_http_status,
k.exchange_ec_code,
to_timestamp(k.next_kyc_poll / 1000000) AT TIME ZONE 'Europe/Zurich' AS timestamp_kyc_poll_cest,
k.kyc_backoff
FROM merchant_kyc k
JOIN merchant_accounts ma ON k.account_serial = ma.account_serial
JOIN merchant_instances mi USING (merchant_serial)
WHERE mi.merchant_id = 'kycauth_2_kyc_ok';
" 2>&1 | cat
SET
merchant_id | business_name | kyc_ok | kyc_timestamp | timestamp_cest | access_token | exchange_url | exchange_http_status | exchange_ec_code | timestamp_kyc_poll_cest | kyc_backoff
------------------+-------------------+--------+------------------+---------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+----------------------+------------------+-------------------------+-------------
kycauth_2_kyc_ok | KYC Auth 2 KYC OK | t | 1780076785000000 | 2026-05-29 19:46:25 | \xb0e861480d1aac501c2dccee4a8e4a24961434230017bc133f2ee30100b1fa87 | https://exchange.stage.taler-ops.ch/ | 200 | 0 | 2026-05-29 19:46:25 | 60000000
kycauth_2_kyc_ok | KYC Auth 2 KYC OK | f | 1780076639000000 | 2026-05-29 19:43:59 | | https://exchange.taler-ops.ch/ | 0 | 10 | 2026-05-29 19:49:48 | 348885239
(2 rows)
2b. Tentative KYC Reset
sudo -u taler-merchant-httpd psql taler-merchant -c "
SET search_path TO merchant;
BEGIN;
UPDATE merchant_kyc
SET
access_token = NULL,
kyc_ok = FALSE,
kyc_timestamp = 0,
exchange_http_status = 0,
exchange_ec_code = 0,
next_kyc_poll = 0,
kyc_backoff = 0
WHERE account_serial IN (
SELECT ma.account_serial
FROM merchant_accounts ma
JOIN merchant_instances mi USING (merchant_serial)
WHERE mi.merchant_id = 'kycauth_2_kyc_ok'
);
COMMIT;
SELECT 'KYC reset completed for instance:' AS status, 'kycauth_2_kyc_ok' AS instance" 2>&1 | cat
SET
BEGIN
UPDATE 2
COMMIT
status | instance
-----------------------------------+------------------
KYC reset completed for instance: | kycauth_2_kyc_ok
(1 row)
2c. Restart of taler-merchant-httpd, and check if it's running Looks fine: systemctl restart taler-merchant-httpd systemctl --failed UNIT LOAD ACTIVE SUB DESCRIPTION 0 loaded units listed. 2d. Check DB entries At first, doesn't look very promising, w/ timestamps equally everywhere at UNIX time zero:
sudo -u taler-merchant-httpd psql taler-merchant -c "
SET search_path TO merchant;
SELECT
mi.merchant_id,
mi.merchant_name AS business_name,
k.kyc_ok,
k.kyc_timestamp,
to_timestamp(k.kyc_timestamp / 1000000) AT TIME ZONE 'Europe/Zurich' AS timestamp_cest,
k.access_token,
k.exchange_url,
k.exchange_http_status,
k.exchange_ec_code,
to_timestamp(k.next_kyc_poll / 1000000) AT TIME ZONE 'Europe/Zurich' AS timestamp_kyc_poll_cest,
k.kyc_backoff
FROM merchant_kyc k
JOIN merchant_accounts ma ON k.account_serial = ma.account_serial
JOIN merchant_instances mi USING (merchant_serial)
WHERE mi.merchant_id = 'kycauth_2_kyc_ok';
" 2>&1 | cat
SET
merchant_id | business_name | kyc_ok | kyc_timestamp | timestamp_cest | access_token | exchange_url | exchange_http_status | exchange_ec_code | timestamp_kyc_poll_cest | kyc_backoff
------------------+-------------------+--------+---------------+---------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------+----------------------+------------------+-------------------------+-------------
kycauth_2_kyc_ok | KYC Auth 2 KYC OK | f | 0 | 1970-01-01 01:00:00 | | https://exchange.stage.taler-ops.ch/ | 0 | 0 | 1970-01-01 01:00:00 | 0
kycauth_2_kyc_ok | KYC Auth 2 KYC OK | f | 0 | 1970-01-01 01:00:00 | | https://exchange.taler-ops.ch/ | 0 | 0 | 1970-01-01 01:00:00 | 0
(2 rows)
In about a minute after, however, situation stabilizes and KYC OK status is indeed reflected again:
sudo -u taler-merchant-httpd psql taler-merchant -c "
SET search_path TO merchant;
SELECT
mi.merchant_id,
mi.merchant_name AS business_name,
k.kyc_ok,
k.kyc_timestamp,
to_timestamp(k.kyc_timestamp / 1000000) AT TIME ZONE 'Europe/Zurich' AS timestamp_cest,
k.access_token,
k.exchange_url,
k.exchange_http_status,
k.exchange_ec_code,
to_timestamp(k.next_kyc_poll / 1000000) AT TIME ZONE 'Europe/Zurich' AS timestamp_kyc_poll_cest,
k.kyc_backoff
FROM merchant_kyc k
JOIN merchant_accounts ma ON k.account_serial = ma.account_serial
JOIN merchant_instances mi USING (merchant_serial)
WHERE mi.merchant_id = 'kycauth_2_kyc_ok';
" 2>&1 | cat
SET
merchant_id | business_name | kyc_ok | kyc_timestamp | timestamp_cest | access_token | exchange_url | exchange_http_status | exchange_ec_code | timestamp_kyc_poll_cest | kyc_backoff
------------------+-------------------+--------+------------------+---------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+----------------------+------------------+-------------------------+-------------
kycauth_2_kyc_ok | KYC Auth 2 KYC OK | t | 1780078443000000 | 2026-05-29 20:14:03 | \xb0e861480d1aac501c2dccee4a8e4a24961434230017bc133f2ee30100b1fa87 | https://exchange.stage.taler-ops.ch/ | 200 | 0 | 2026-05-29 20:16:24 | 60000000
kycauth_2_kyc_ok | KYC Auth 2 KYC OK | f | 0 | 1970-01-01 01:00:00 | | https://exchange.taler-ops.ch/ | 0 | 0 | 2026-05-29 20:16:24 | 0
(2 rows)
From a cosmetic perspective or to keep more up w/ reality, first timestamp could be set to current time instead of going towards "year zero": 2e. Check merchant portal KYC situation looks fine / the same as before. |
|
|
3. Test for kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw 3a. DB situation w/ relevant KYC fields found Similar foundings as for 2a. above, while not equivalent as what concerns timestamps:
sudo -u taler-merchant-httpd psql taler-merchant -c "
SET search_path TO merchant;
SELECT
mi.merchant_id,
mi.merchant_name AS business_name,
k.kyc_ok,
k.kyc_timestamp,
to_timestamp(k.kyc_timestamp / 1000000) AT TIME ZONE 'Europe/Zurich' AS timestamp_cest,
k.access_token,
k.exchange_url,
k.exchange_http_status,
k.exchange_ec_code,
to_timestamp(k.next_kyc_poll / 1000000) AT TIME ZONE 'Europe/Zurich' AS timestamp_kyc_poll_cest,
k.kyc_backoff
FROM merchant_kyc k
JOIN merchant_accounts ma ON k.account_serial = ma.account_serial
JOIN merchant_instances mi USING (merchant_serial)
WHERE mi.merchant_id = 'kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw';
" 2>&1 | cat
SET
merchant_id | business_name | kyc_ok | kyc_timestamp | timestamp_cest | access_token | exchange_url | exchange_http_status | exchange_ec_code | timestamp_kyc_poll_cest | kyc_backoff
--------------------------------+---------------+--------+------------------+---------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------+----------------------+------------------+-------------------------+-------------
kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw | Tammy Tester | t | 1780087444000000 | 2026-05-29 22:44:04 | | https://exchange.stage.taler-ops.ch/ | 0 | 10 | 2026-05-29 22:46:20 | 136560000
kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw | Tammy Tester | f | 1780087444000000 | 2026-05-29 22:44:04 | | https://exchange.taler-ops.ch/ | 0 | 10 | 2026-05-29 23:09:29 | 1525162030
(2 rows)
3b. Tentative KYC Reset
sudo -u taler-merchant-httpd psql taler-merchant -c "
SET search_path TO merchant;
BEGIN;
UPDATE merchant_kyc
SET
access_token = NULL,
kyc_ok = FALSE,
kyc_timestamp = 0,
exchange_http_status = 0,
exchange_ec_code = 0,
next_kyc_poll = 0,
kyc_backoff = 0
WHERE account_serial IN (
SELECT ma.account_serial
FROM merchant_accounts ma
JOIN merchant_instances mi USING (merchant_serial)
WHERE mi.merchant_id = 'kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw'
);
COMMIT;
SELECT 'KYC reset completed for instance:' AS status, 'kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw' AS instance" 2>&1 | cat
SET
BEGIN
UPDATE 2
COMMIT
status | instance
-----------------------------------+--------------------------------
KYC reset completed for instance: | kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw
(1 row)
3c. Restart of taler-merchant-httpd, and check if it's running Fine: systemctl restart taler-merchant-httpd systemctl --failed UNIT LOAD ACTIVE SUB DESCRIPTION 0 loaded units listed. 3d. Check DB entries First, like for 2d. above:
sudo -u taler-merchant-httpd psql taler-merchant -c "
SET search_path TO merchant;
SELECT
mi.merchant_id,
mi.merchant_name AS business_name,
k.kyc_ok,
k.kyc_timestamp,
to_timestamp(k.kyc_timestamp / 1000000) AT TIME ZONE 'Europe/Zurich' AS timestamp_cest,
k.access_token,
k.exchange_url,
k.exchange_http_status,
k.exchange_ec_code,
to_timestamp(k.next_kyc_poll / 1000000) AT TIME ZONE 'Europe/Zurich' AS timestamp_kyc_poll_cest,
k.kyc_backoff
FROM merchant_kyc k
JOIN merchant_accounts ma ON k.account_serial = ma.account_serial
JOIN merchant_instances mi USING (merchant_serial)
WHERE mi.merchant_id = 'kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw';
" 2>&1 | cat
SET
merchant_id | business_name | kyc_ok | kyc_timestamp | timestamp_cest | access_token | exchange_url | exchange_http_status | exchange_ec_code | timestamp_kyc_poll_cest | kyc_backoff
--------------------------------+---------------+--------+---------------+---------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------+----------------------+------------------+-------------------------+-------------
kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw | Tammy Tester | f | 0 | 1970-01-01 01:00:00 | | https://exchange.stage.taler-ops.ch/ | 0 | 0 | 1970-01-01 01:00:00 | 0
kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw | Tammy Tester | f | 0 | 1970-01-01 01:00:00 | | https://exchange.taler-ops.ch/ | 0 | 0 | 1970-01-01 01:00:00 | 0
(2 rows)
No quick change as in 2d., however: when logging in, a timestamp change can be observed, but no change in showing that KYC is already OK towards the stage exchange:
sudo -u taler-merchant-httpd psql taler-merchant -c "
SET search_path TO merchant;
SELECT
mi.merchant_id,
mi.merchant_name AS business_name,
k.kyc_ok,
k.kyc_timestamp,
to_timestamp(k.kyc_timestamp / 1000000) AT TIME ZONE 'Europe/Zurich' AS timestamp_cest,
k.access_token,
k.exchange_url,
k.exchange_http_status,
k.exchange_ec_code,
to_timestamp(k.next_kyc_poll / 1000000) AT TIME ZONE 'Europe/Zurich' AS timestamp_kyc_poll_cest,
k.kyc_backoff
FROM merchant_kyc k
JOIN merchant_accounts ma ON k.account_serial = ma.account_serial
JOIN merchant_instances mi USING (merchant_serial)
WHERE mi.merchant_id = 'kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw';
" 2>&1 | cat
SET
merchant_id | business_name | kyc_ok | kyc_timestamp | timestamp_cest | access_token | exchange_url | exchange_http_status | exchange_ec_code | timestamp_kyc_poll_cest | kyc_backoff
--------------------------------+---------------+--------+---------------+---------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------+----------------------+------------------+-------------------------+-------------
kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw | Tammy Tester | f | 0 | 1970-01-01 01:00:00 | | https://exchange.stage.taler-ops.ch/ | 0 | 0 | 2026-05-29 22:52:54 | 0
kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw | Tammy Tester | f | 0 | 1970-01-01 01:00:00 | | https://exchange.taler-ops.ch/ | 0 | 0 | 2026-05-29 22:52:54 | 0
(2 rows)
3e. Check merchant portal After about 10mins of taler-merchant-httpd being active, there's still no recovery of the situation for this third instance: indeed, KYC is being offered again. 3f. Check taler-merchant-httpd logs It's reflected in the logs, indeed, that instance 3 used for withdraw and for being a merchant from and to the same exchange using the very same IBAN (no real account, used in stage), doesn't get its actual KYC status recovered: [...] May 29 22:58:38 betel taler-merchant-httpd[17959]: (HBXE7KS1NKCX7YWWMPQ8P4SDVW) INFO Handling request (GET) for URL '/instances/kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw/private/accounts' May 29 22:58:38 betel taler-merchant-httpd[17959]: (HBXE7KS1NKCX7YWWMPQ8P4SDVW) INFO Request for `/instances/kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw/private/accounts' completed with HTTP status 200 (0) May 29 22:58:38 betel taler-merchant-httpd[17959]: (C84QP2NJJ57ZSWSBM3E0JWFQ7R) INFO Handling request (GET) for URL '/instances/kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw/config' May 29 22:58:38 betel taler-merchant-httpd[17959]: (C84QP2NJJ57ZSWSBM3E0JWFQ7R) INFO Request for `/instances/kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw/config' completed with HTTP status 200 (0) May 29 22:58:38 betel taler-merchant-httpd[17959]: (8X53Y4MF2BAA7E0ZPWAN9ZBYFG) INFO Handling request (GET) for URL '/instances/kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw/private/kyc' May 29 22:58:38 betel taler-merchant-httpd[17959]: (8X53Y4MF2BAA7E0ZPWAN9ZBYFG) INFO KYC status requested for format application/json May 29 22:58:38 betel taler-merchant-httpd[17959]: (8X53Y4MF2BAA7E0ZPWAN9ZBYFG) INFO Checking KYC status for kycauth_3_kyc_ok_with_withdraw (0/(null)) May 29 22:58:38 betel taler-merchant-httpd[17959]: (8X53Y4MF2BAA7E0ZPWAN9ZBYFG) INFO Got 2 KYC records May 29 22:58:38 betel taler-merchant-httpd[17959]: (8X53Y4MF2BAA7E0ZPWAN9ZBYFG) INFO KYC status for `payto://iban/CH6690986631600451656?receiver-name=Tammy%20Tester' at `https://exchange.stage.taler-ops.ch/' is 0/KYC NEEDED/NO AML REVIEW/CUSTOM LIMITS May 29 22:58:38 betel taler-merchant-httpd[17959]: (8X53Y4MF2BAA7E0ZPWAN9ZBYFG) INFO KYC status for `payto://iban/CH6690986631600451656?receiver-name=Tammy%20Tester' at `https://exchange.taler-ops.ch/' is 0/KYC NEEDED/NO AML REVIEW/DEFAULT LIMITS [...] |
|
|
Eh, but in situation #3 we WANT the user to be offered KYC (finally) as they never could have done the KYC Auth before and must do it! |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-27 19:34 | vecirex | New Issue | |
| 2026-05-27 19:34 | vecirex | Description Updated | |
| 2026-05-27 19:35 | vecirex | Assigned To | => vecirex |
| 2026-05-27 19:35 | vecirex | Status | new => assigned |
| 2026-05-27 19:38 | vecirex | Description Updated | |
| 2026-05-27 19:38 | vecirex | Description Updated | |
| 2026-05-29 19:08 | vecirex | Note Added: 0028733 | |
| 2026-05-29 19:09 | vecirex | Note Edited: 0028733 | |
| 2026-05-29 19:10 | vecirex | Steps to Reproduce Updated | |
| 2026-05-29 19:10 | vecirex | Additional Information Updated | |
| 2026-05-29 19:45 | vecirex | Note Added: 0028734 | |
| 2026-05-29 19:56 | vecirex | Note Edited: 0028734 | |
| 2026-05-29 19:57 | vecirex | Note Edited: 0028734 | |
| 2026-05-29 19:57 | vecirex | Status | assigned => feedback |
| 2026-05-29 20:00 | vecirex | Note Added: 0028735 | |
| 2026-05-29 20:00 | vecirex | Note Edited: 0028735 | |
| 2026-05-29 20:00 | vecirex | Note Edited: 0028734 | |
| 2026-05-29 20:08 | vecirex | Note Edited: 0028735 | |
| 2026-05-29 20:12 | vecirex | Note Edited: 0028735 | |
| 2026-05-29 20:22 | vecirex | Note Edited: 0028735 | |
| 2026-05-29 20:27 | vecirex | Note Edited: 0028735 | |
| 2026-05-29 20:27 | vecirex | Note Edited: 0028734 | |
| 2026-05-29 22:43 | vecirex | Note Added: 0028739 | |
| 2026-05-29 22:44 | vecirex | Note Edited: 0028739 | |
| 2026-05-29 22:57 | vecirex | Note Edited: 0028739 | |
| 2026-05-29 22:57 | vecirex | Note Edited: 0028739 | |
| 2026-05-29 23:01 | vecirex | Note Edited: 0028739 | |
| 2026-05-29 23:15 | vecirex | Note Edited: 0028739 | |
| 2026-05-30 07:55 | Christian Grothoff | Note Added: 0028741 |