View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0010446 | Taler | merchant backend | public | 2025-09-23 10:41 | 2025-09-23 16:14 |
| Reporter | Florian Dold | Assigned To | Christian Grothoff | ||
| Priority | high | Severity | major | Reproducibility | have not tried |
| Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Target Version | 1.1 | Fixed in Version | 1.1 | ||
| Summary | 0010446: order of PaymentResponse.token_sigs under-specified / donau sigs should be separate | ||||
| Description | It looks like in PaymentResponse.token_sigs, *both* the tokens signed by the merchant and the tokens signed via donau are returned. However, it's unclear how they're ordered. Part of the response tokens are determined by PayWalletData.tokens_evs, while another part is determined by PayWalletData.donau. But it is not clear how they're ordered. Which ones come first? IMO PaymentResponse should have a separate fields for returned donau tokens and not mix them up with discount/subscription tokens. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
|
|
The order returned is the same as in the outputs array. So whatever position the donation has in the outputs array is where you will get the Donau blind signatures. |
|
|
Improved documentation on PaymentResponse in f5f172df..44ca0161 to hopefully clarify the order of the signed outputs. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-23 10:41 | Florian Dold | New Issue | |
| 2025-09-23 13:24 | Christian Grothoff | Assigned To | => Christian Grothoff |
| 2025-09-23 13:24 | Christian Grothoff | Status | new => assigned |
| 2025-09-23 13:28 | Christian Grothoff | Note Added: 0025985 | |
| 2025-09-23 16:14 | Christian Grothoff | Status | assigned => resolved |
| 2025-09-23 16:14 | Christian Grothoff | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2025-09-23 16:14 | Christian Grothoff | Fixed in Version | => 1.1 |
| 2025-09-23 16:14 | Christian Grothoff | Note Added: 0025991 |
