View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0009220 | Taler | libeufin-bank | public | 2024-09-23 21:16 | 2024-12-13 18:15 |
| Reporter | sebasjm | Assigned To | sebasjm | Resolution deadline | |
| Implementer | Reviewer | ||||
| Release signed by | Deployed by | ||||
| Verifier | Communicator | ||||
| Data protection authority notification required | No | ||||
| CSIRT notification required | No | ||||
| Estimated effort (hours) | Actual effort (hours) | 0 | |||
| Fast-track | No | ||||
| Work package | none | ||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Product Version | 0.14 | ||||
| Target Version | 0.14 | Fixed in Version | 0.14 | ||
| Summary | 0009220: cant create transaction using subject as payto param | ||||
| Description | curl 'http://bank.taler.test:1180/accounts/merchant/transactions' --data-raw '{"payto_uri":"payto://iban/DE9714548806481?receiver-name=Exchanger%20Normal&subject=T369W2DTCA1HXD9M9J3W04RQR73A024AC6KNP8NSKXFS4TXMYZZG","amount":"YEIN:2","request_uid":"W3VVKZW26TQGSTP14TQ5AJEQ2A1WE1KE33FN6DN2D9AB3YXJKX3G"}' --compressed --insecure {"code":22,"hint":"Wire transfer lacks subject"} | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| in many places we mention subject instead of message in the payto the rfc doesn't mention `subject` https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8905/ I will be happy to remove the support of the subject parameter, but I'm not sure if this is being used in other places | |
| Yes we use the 'message' query param as the transaction subject. it's quite confusing but it's spec compliant. What do you subject ? That we accept both 'message' or 'subject' ? | |
| this issue was created because the payto in the issue description was generated by the exchange and did not work with libeufin bank. christian fix that here https://bugs.gnunet.org/view.php?id=9216 I was confused by the `subject` but it seems that we don't need to support this, there is no reason. After I read the RFC again i'm against using `subject`, I will remove support from merchant backoffice and any other place (i think that bank-spa also treat `subject` param as `message` param in payto) | |
| fixed by @christian here https://bugs.gnunet.org/view.php?id=9216 | |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-23 21:16 | sebasjm | New Issue | |
| 2024-09-23 21:16 | sebasjm | Status | new => assigned |
| 2024-09-23 21:16 | sebasjm | Assigned To | => Antoine A |
| 2024-09-23 21:20 | sebasjm | Note Added: 0023361 | |
| 2024-09-27 10:44 | Antoine A | Assigned To | Antoine A => sebasjm |
| 2024-09-27 10:44 | Antoine A | Status | assigned => feedback |
| 2024-09-27 10:44 | Antoine A | Note Added: 0023381 | |
| 2024-09-29 20:52 | sebasjm | Note Added: 0023404 | |
| 2024-09-29 20:52 | sebasjm | Status | feedback => informing |
| 2024-09-29 20:52 | sebasjm | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2024-09-29 20:52 | sebasjm | Note Added: 0023405 | |
| 2024-10-07 14:35 | Christian Grothoff | Fixed in Version | => 0.14 |
| 2024-12-13 18:15 | Christian Grothoff | Status | informing => closed |