View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0007252 | Taler | merchant backend | public | 2022-06-01 09:54 | 2022-11-04 19:52 |
| Reporter | Florian Dold | Assigned To | oec | Resolution deadline | |
| Implementer | Reviewer | ||||
| Release signed by | Deployed by | ||||
| Verifier | Communicator | ||||
| Data protection authority notification required | No | ||||
| CSIRT notification required | No | ||||
| Estimated effort (hours) | Actual effort (hours) | 0 | |||
| Fast-track | No | ||||
| Work package | none | ||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Target Version | 0.9 | Fixed in Version | 0.9 | ||
| Summary | 0007252: merchant doesn't accept payment for non-age-restricted order with age-restricted coins | ||||
| Description | When paying for a non-age-restricted order with age-restricted coins, the wallet creates a deposit permission with the fields dp.minimum_age_sig = undefined; // because we don't need to attest age dp.age_commitment = ac; // because the merchant needs to compute h_age_commitment to check deposit permission However, the merchant doesn't like that combination: { "code": 26, "hint": "A parameter in the request was malformed.", "detail": "inconsistency: 'mininum_age_sig' vs. 'age_commitment'" } The merchant ought to either accept this combination or require explicit passing of h_age_commitment in the deposit request if the coin is age restricted, no matter whether the order is age restricted or not. | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce | taler-wallet-cli testing run-integrationtests age-restrictions | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Good catch. We _could_ reuse the field 'age_commitment' for the _hash_ of the age commitment in the case that 'minimum_age_sig' is undefined and minimum age wasn't required. What do you think? | |
| Well, clearer yet, let's have an optional field 'h_age_commitment' that must be set by the wallet in case of minimum age wasn't required and the coin had age commitment set. | |
| Should be resolved with 72695e8e41bb75b44d3d09ad5316eb9d48ac25d7 | |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-01 09:54 | Florian Dold | New Issue | |
| 2022-06-01 09:54 | Florian Dold | Status | new => assigned |
| 2022-06-01 09:54 | Florian Dold | Assigned To | => oec |
| 2022-06-01 10:44 | oec | Note Added: 0018910 | |
| 2022-06-01 10:51 | oec | Note Added: 0018911 | |
| 2022-06-29 12:45 | oec | Status | assigned => informing |
| 2022-06-29 12:45 | oec | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2022-06-29 12:45 | oec | Note Added: 0018949 | |
| 2022-10-20 08:47 | Christian Grothoff | Fixed in Version | => 0.9 |
| 2022-10-20 08:48 | Christian Grothoff | Target Version | => 0.9 |
| 2022-11-04 19:52 | Christian Grothoff | Status | informing => closed |
| 2025-03-22 13:09 | Christian Grothoff | Category | mechant backend => merchant backend |