View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0007137 | GNUnet | DHT service | public | 2021-12-31 12:30 | 2022-03-19 17:11 |
| Reporter | schanzen | Assigned To | Christian Grothoff | Due Date | |
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Target Version | 0.16.2 | Fixed in Version | 0.16.2 | ||
| Summary | 0007137: LSD0004: Node ID and crypto | ||||
| Description | Should Node IDs (e.g. public keys) and their crypto be agile? This is relevant for HELLOs and DHT path signatures. If the Node ID in a HELLO can be agile (i.e. NOT a Ed25519 public key or its hash), then the path signatures MUST also be agile. If the path signatures MUST be Ed25519 signatures, then the Node IDs in the HELLO MUST NOT be agile as that would not really make sense. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-31 12:30 | schanzen | New Issue | |
| 2021-12-31 12:30 | schanzen | Status | new => assigned |
| 2021-12-31 12:30 | schanzen | Assigned To | => Christian Grothoff |
| 2022-03-04 22:45 | schanzen | Target Version | 0.17.0 => 0.16.2 |
| 2022-03-04 22:45 | schanzen | Status | assigned => resolved |
| 2022-03-04 22:45 | schanzen | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2022-03-04 22:45 | schanzen | Fixed in Version | => 0.16.2 |
| 2022-03-04 22:45 | schanzen | Note Added: 0018764 | |
| 2022-03-19 17:11 | schanzen | Note Added: 0018819 | |
| 2022-03-19 17:11 | schanzen | Status | resolved => closed |