View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0003917 | GNUnet | file-sharing service | public | 2015-07-25 13:56 | 2018-06-06 22:25 |
| Reporter | remibd | Assigned To | Christian Grothoff | Due Date | |
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||
| Product Version | 0.10.1 | ||||
| Target Version | 0.11.0pre66 | Fixed in Version | 0.11.0pre66 | ||
| Summary | 0003917: Simulating publication in a namespace causes a segfault | ||||
| Description | `GNUNET_FS_publish_sks` segfaults when called with options=GNUNET_FS_PUBLISH_OPTION_SIMULATE_ONLY. It impacts `gnunet-publish`. | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce | $ gnunet-publish -s -P <ego> -t <id> <file> | ||||
| Additional Information | Reason of the segfault: fs/fs_namespace.c:460, inside the definition of `GNUNET_FS_publish_sks`, the variable `psc->dsh` is initialized to NULL and it’s value is given to the static function `GNUNET_FS_publish_ublock_`, which will try to dereference it. -------------------------------------------------------------- OS : Linux OS RELEASE : 4.1.2-2-ARCH HARDWARE : x86_64 gcc : gcc (GCC) 5.1.0 make : 4.1 autoconf : 2.69 automake : 1.15 libtool : 2.4.6 libextractor : v1.0.1 GNUnet 0.8 : Not Found (good) GNUnet 0.9 : 0.10.1 libgcrypt : 1.6.3 mysql : Not Found pkg-config : 0.28 glib2 : 2.44.1 gtk2+ : 2.24.28 GMP : Test not available libunistring : Test not available GNU gettext : 0.19.4 libcurl : 7.43.0 libgnurl : 7.40.0 libmicrohttpd : 94200 GNU GLPK : Not found GNUtls : 3.4.2 -------------------------------------------------------------- | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| I've looked at the code AND tried to reproduce it, and I cannot. The GNUNET_FS_publish_ublock_ function in my code DOES check for dsh being NULL, the check was introduced in SVN 33766 (June 23rd, 2014): http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnunet-svn/2014-06/msg00309.html My guess is that you're running 0.10.1 instead of using Subversion and are thus missing out on hundreds of bugfixes... | |
| No feedback from remibd after almost a week, assuming he was using 0.10.1 and this was already resolved. | |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-07-25 13:56 | remibd | New Issue | |
| 2015-07-27 12:39 | Christian Grothoff | Note Added: 0009486 | |
| 2015-07-27 12:39 | Christian Grothoff | Assigned To | => Christian Grothoff |
| 2015-07-27 12:39 | Christian Grothoff | Status | new => feedback |
| 2015-07-27 12:39 | Christian Grothoff | Product Version | => 0.10.1 |
| 2015-07-27 12:39 | Christian Grothoff | Target Version | => 0.11.0pre66 |
| 2015-08-03 11:38 | Christian Grothoff | Note Added: 0009522 | |
| 2015-08-03 11:38 | Christian Grothoff | Status | feedback => resolved |
| 2015-08-03 11:38 | Christian Grothoff | Fixed in Version | => 0.11.0pre66 |
| 2015-08-03 11:38 | Christian Grothoff | Resolution | open => no change required |
| 2018-06-06 22:25 | Christian Grothoff | Status | resolved => closed |