View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0011506 | Taler | documentation | public | 2026-06-10 16:32 | 2026-09-19 14:41 |
| Reporter | Florian Dold | Assigned To | Florian Dold | Resolution deadline | |
| Implementer | Reviewer | ||||
| Release signed by | Deployed by | ||||
| Verifier | Communicator | ||||
| Data protection authority notification required | No | ||||
| CSIRT notification required | No | ||||
| Estimated effort (hours) | Actual effort (hours) | 0 | |||
| Fast-track | No | ||||
| Work package | none | ||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | have not tried |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Target Version | 1.6 | Fixed in Version | 1.6 | ||
| Summary | 0011506: write DD for 100% fee idea | ||||
| Description | There are a bunch of open questions: * What will the currency be called? * CHF/EUR but with some meta-data to distinguish it from "transferable" CHF/EUR * Separate currency name * How will the exchange signal the fees? I've heard different ideas floating around regarding this | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| related to | 0011507 | implementing | vlada.svirsh | Design UI for 100% fee idea |
| Good questions. Do we want one currency, or does it make sense to distinguish between say BTC/USD/EUR/CHF-backed 100%-fee coins? I think it makes little practical difference to the user/merchant, modulo with BTC the amounts would be VERY different (say 100 Satoshi instead of 1 cent). If we use one currency, we might also literally use a single exchange with just many bank accounts and conversion. We've never tested that, but I think in principle we could have an exchange take CHF to NETZBON and also EUR to NETZBON from another exchange bank account, so we could have a single exchange for everything. To be confirmed though -- this was never tested. That said, not sure a single global exchange is ideal for this from a performance perspective (network latency would be high). The exchange will signal the fees using the usual mechanisms: STEFAN_LIN = 1 and denomination deposit fees at the denomination value. The bigger question is how the wallets should *render* those to explain to the user what the deal here is. | |
| My current thinking: call the currency "CAPTCHA". That relates everything to a concept people already fully understand, and makes it clear it's not digital cash in the usual sense. | |
| See DD 95. | |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-10 16:32 | Florian Dold | New Issue | |
| 2026-06-10 16:36 | vlada.svirsh | Relationship added | related to 0011507 |
| 2026-06-10 23:37 | Christian Grothoff | Severity | minor => feature |
| 2026-06-10 23:44 | Christian Grothoff | Note Added: 0028856 | |
| 2026-06-13 20:07 | Christian Grothoff | Note Added: 0028883 | |
| 2026-06-13 20:07 | Christian Grothoff | Status | new => implementing |
| 2026-06-13 20:07 | Christian Grothoff | Target Version | => 1.7 |
| 2026-06-16 09:07 | Christian Grothoff | Assigned To | => Christian Grothoff |
| 2026-06-16 09:07 | Christian Grothoff | Status | implementing => assigned |
| 2026-06-16 09:07 | Christian Grothoff | Status | assigned => implementing |
| 2026-06-16 13:07 | Christian Grothoff | Status | implementing => assigned |
| 2026-06-16 17:11 | Christian Grothoff | Assigned To | Christian Grothoff => Florian Dold |
| 2026-06-16 17:11 | Christian Grothoff | Status | assigned => feedback |
| 2026-06-16 17:11 | Christian Grothoff | Note Added: 0028916 | |
| 2026-08-27 09:03 | Florian Dold | Status | feedback => informing |
| 2026-08-27 09:03 | Florian Dold | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2026-08-29 15:01 | vecirex | Status | informing => closed |
| 2026-09-19 14:41 | Christian Grothoff | Fixed in Version | => 1.6 |
| 2026-09-19 14:41 | Christian Grothoff | Target Version | 1.7 => 1.6 |